x80 steels (JEOL)
Structured Review
![Fig. 1. (a-c) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs and (d-f) optical micrographs of microstructures of the API X60, X70, and <t>X80</t> pipeline steels, respectively [11]. Longitudinal-transverse (L-S) planes are observed. Polygonal ferrite (PF), acicular ferrite (AF), granular bainite (GB), and bainitic ferrite (BF) are marked in Figs. 1 (a-c). Figs. 1 (d-f) show the microstructure etched in Lepera solution, and martensite-austenite (MA) constituents are indicated by the white arrow. The volume fraction of the MA constituent in the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels was measured to be 4.3%, 6.0%, and 7.8%, respectively](https://doi-unpaywalled-images-cdn.bioz.com/4357/10__24425_slash_amm__2024__149757/10__24425_slash_amm__2024__149757____page2_image1.jpg)
X80 Steels, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 25601 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/x80+steels/10__24425_slash_amm__2024__149757-15-7-15?v=JEOL
Average 97 stars, based on 25601 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Effect of Microstructural Constituents on Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance of API X60, X70, and X80 Pipeline Steels"
Article Title: Effect of Microstructural Constituents on Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance of API X60, X70, and X80 Pipeline Steels
Journal: Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
doi: 10.24425/amm.2024.149757
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 1. (a-c) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs and (d-f) optical micrographs of microstructures of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels, respectively [11]. Longitudinal-transverse (L-S) planes are observed. Polygonal ferrite (PF), acicular ferrite (AF), granular bainite (GB), and bainitic ferrite (BF) are marked in Figs. 1 (a-c). Figs. 1 (d-f) show the microstructure etched in Lepera solution, and martensite-austenite (MA) constituents are indicated by the white arrow. The volume fraction of the MA constituent in the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels was measured to be 4.3%, 6.0%, and 7.8%, respectively
Techniques Used: Microscopy
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 2. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) inverse pole figure (IPF) and grain boundary misorientation maps of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels [11]. Longitudinal-transverse (L-S) planes are observed. Polygonal ferrite (PF), acicular ferrite (AF), granular bainite (GB), and bainitic ferrite (BF) are marked in IPF maps. In grain boundary misorientation maps, the angle ranges of blue and black lines are 5 ~ 15°, and >15°, respectively. The grain size and fraction of the high-angle grain boundary of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels were calculated to be 20.5 μm and 4.3%, 17.6 μm and 6.0%, and 16.1 μm and 7.8%, respectively
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3. Engineering stress-strain curves before and after electrochemi- cal hydrogen charging of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels. The specimen before electrochemical hydrogen charging was marked as Non-charged, and the specimen after electrochemical hydrogen charging was referred to as H-charged. The relative total elongation of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels was measured to be 0.99, 1.02, and 0.72, respectively
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) fractographs for tensile specimens of the API X60, X70, and X80 pipeline steels before and after electrochemical hydrogen charging. The specimen before electrochemical hydrogen charging was marked as Non-charged, and the specimen after electrochemical hydrogen charging was referred to as H-charged. The yellow arrow indicates the quasi-cleavage fracture features in the API X80 pipeline steel
Techniques Used: Microscopy
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of the API X80 pipeline steel after electrochemical hydrogen charging for 24 hours at the current density of 150 A/m2 in the 3% NaCl solution. After electro- chemical hydrogen charging, the specimen was maintained in a 4.3 mM K[Ag(CN)2] solution for 24 hours. The yellow arrow in Fig. 4 shows the localized precipitation of silver clusters surrounding martensite- austenite (MA) constituents
Techniques Used: Microscopy
